Given that the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been arrived at, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

How much sway case law holds may well vary by jurisdiction, and by the exact circumstances with the current case. To check out this concept, think about the following case law definition.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents of your boy or Lady tend not to approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they will do if they will Slash off social relations with the son or the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who presents this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by law.

The loads of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it really is made obvious that police is free to take action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities subject matter to regulation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. In the event the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-industry duties within the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Unfortunately, that wasn't accurate. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son instructed his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two times later, and admitted to possessing sexually molested the pair’s son several times.

However it is made obvious that police is free to consider action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities matter to law. However no harassment shall be caused on the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also make certain regard in the family shed in accordance with legislation and should they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they're able to act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and acquire necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate like a issue of security of the house is concerned, which is just not public place under the Act 1977. nine. Thinking of the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition is achieved. As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated over. Read more

116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice on the Peace u/s 22-A is just not obliged to afford a possibility of hearing on the accused party; nor get more info obliged to automatically or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is needed to take into account all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the relevant factors. Read more

168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Subject matter: Appeal At times it really is practical for a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to create an attempt to dispose of a case on merit and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's attained to the stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it has reached such stage. Read more

The DCFS social worker in charge with the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her six-month report to the court, the worker elaborated to the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by legislation." It truly is well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is properly-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 times. Should the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then strategy the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the 90 days to the department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we are guided from the decision of your Supreme Court from the case of Dr.

The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to get gathered with the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

8. For that reasons stated earlier mentioned, this court finds the petition to be without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend during the comments, and their request is thus acceded to. All pending applications, if any, can also be dismissed. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), and also the petitioners might find remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more